On sittingnut’s “quick note on sarath fonseka arrest”
According to sittingnut’s latest article titled “quick note on sarath fonseka arrest”, Fonseka should be arrested because of three reasons. One, he betrayed and endangered military officers. Two, he undermined and is undermining democracy. Three, he called and is calling for foreign intervention. These are the three reasons sittingnut gives us to justify Fonseka arrest…. So according to him, Mahinda should be arrested as well. First, do you remember there was a time Mahinda called for foreign intervention? I think he had every right to do so. The UNP government was gunning down Human Rights. But the point is that he called for foreign intervention… Secondly, I believe I don’t even have to waste a single keystroke to prove that Mahinda’s underming and will continue to undermine democracy… Thirdly, yes Fonseka did betray and endanger military officers. But if you say he betrayed them, you also have to accept that they did commit war crimes. So they’re war criminals. Is exposing war crimes and war criminals wrong (I mean morally)? Legally however, perhaps it is wrong. But then, law has ceased to make any sense these days. We even have a part of the constitution ripped off the constitution and used as a toilet paper… I however, believe that these soldiers shouldn’t be exposed even if they did commit war crimes, for they did what they had to do. I think that is morally wrong, but I also think it’s the sensible thing to do… Anyway, two of the three reasons sittingnut has given us to justify the arrest can be used against Mahinda Rajapakse. So why doesn’t sittingnut think that Mahinda should be arrested? Is it simply because the President cannot legally be arrested?… Once again the Nut has shown that he’s just a government propagandist.