Lanka Libertarian (Sittingnut) isn’t libertarian.

25/01/2010

And whenever someone accuses him of that, he asks “where have I said anything against the libertarian principle.” Ha ha ha. I don’t say anything against Al Queda. Does that make me a crazy Muslim looking for a building to blow up?… A true libertarian, should be libertarian, instead of trying his best to not be un-libertarian… Now, if somebody takes away another’s democratic rights, it should metaphorically piss off a true libertarian. So, where have the Lanka Libertarian said anything against election violence? Where have the Lanka Libertarian said anything against election fraud. Where have the Lanka Libertarian said anything against the blatant abuse of state media, power and everything else. I can go on and on… I don’t think even I have written against all of them. But if you read me, you’ll see that it’s implied that I’m against all of them. What about the libertarian blog?… Again, not writing anything against the libertarian principle isn’t enough to make one a libertarian. He should write things libertarian. He should try to convince us all of the ideology called Libertarianism… Instead, we have a Roman-Catholic-Sinhalese-Buddhist-Mahinda-Supporter who calls himself a libertarian, simply because he doesn’t write anything against libertarianism.

Advertisements

One Response to “Lanka Libertarian (Sittingnut) isn’t libertarian.”

  1. lefroy Says:

    You haven’t answered. Election violence? Election fraud? Blatant abuse of state power, resources?

Leave a reply and get lefroyed

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s