Why doesn’t Indi.Padashow censor stupidity?

As you all know, Ind.Padashow censored me off his blog. Soon he did the same to a guy named Heshan, someone who often commented there. A long time before all that, he banned shitnut (a.k.a lanka libertarian who got a.raped by lefroy). I’m sure there are many more. Of course, just like Mahinda Rajapakse, Mervyn Silva and the late Steve Jobs, he likes to give his readers a controlled experience on his blog; controlled by him.

It is interesting however that no matter what he censors, Indi.Padashow never seems to censor stupidity. You can say the dumbest thing ever and you’ll still be welcome there. Here’s an example.

A person named ‘kaush’ commented on an article of Indi.Padashow titled “Richard Dawkins at the Galle Literary Festival”. It is my policy to not promote stuff that are just plain dumb, so you won’t find a link to that stupid article where Indi.Padashow had tried pathetically to prove that Dawkins was wrong about something the i.padashow doesn’t understand. But here’s what ‘kaush’ said.

in what way karma fall into bullshit…if any physical action will generate an reaction, why it is not logical to say a mental action will also generate a reaction?

Really kaush?
0 marks for science
0 marks for logic
100 marks for proving the point I make over and over though, that buddhists are just plain stupid.

You are so stupid that you shouldn’t be allowed to speak. I know that you, being the dumbest m..f..cker ever lived, are going to think that I mean this literaly.

So why doesn’t Indi.Padashow censor such stupidity, when we know very well that it’s not his principle to not censor anything? It is because he, being stupid, likes people who are even more stupid than him, so that he can feel normal.

So, be David Blacker, and go and comment there. You’ll be loved.